Henry Kissinger Confronted About AIDS and Depopulating Africa

Henry Kissinger Confronted About AIDS and Depopulating Africa
NationBuilder, 9/9/08

During a CFR-event at the RNC last week, a brave individual asked Dr. Henry Kissinger if he still regarded third world population growth as the biggest threat to national security or if terrorism had surpassed it. The doctor of death said that the two were connected.



Connecting terrorism to third world population growth reminds me of uber globalist Dr. Thomas PM Barnett's prediction that by 2050 Africa will be the new wave of terrorism and the new target of our global war on emotional feelings. In other words, after we steal all the resources from the Middle East and destroy them, we'll have to create a new threat in a new resource-laden land.

Back in March, I posted a blog about Henry Kissinger's 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200. The same day I posted a declassified US Senate hearing from 1969 about creating synthetic human immune viruses.

That Senate hearing 39 years ago stated that the US Government should create a synthetic biological agent that does not naturally exist and one with no natural immunity. Even though they said it could lead to "massive killing of large populations", the report stated we must develop the agent as a defensive measure against foreign biological warfare tactics. (If we don't do it, our enemy will and when they do we will be vulnerable.)

Five years later, Dr. Kissinger wrote NSSM 200 which created the justification to use biological warfare against Africa in order to preserve their resources for our economic growth. In the video above, Dr. Kissinger says he is unaware of NSSM200 and when the individual told him that he wrote it, Kissinger scoffed and said "grow up".

Kissinger's NSSM200 entitled Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests:

...depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World.

...

Reduction of the rate of population in these States is a matter of vital US national security.

...

The US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries. That fact gives the US enhanced interests in the political, economic and social stability of the supplying countries. Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and to the economic interests of the United States.

Finally, here is perhaps the most frightening US Senate hearing ever declassified. After this hearing, the research to create a synthetic human virus was funded with $10 million.

-------------------------------------------

Biological Warfare and Engineered Human Immune Viruses
SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman

ROBERT L. F. SIKES, Florida
GLENARD P LIPSCOMB, California
JAMIE D. WHITTEN, Mississippi
WILLIAM E. MINSHALL, Ohio
GEORGE W. ANDREWS, Alabama
JOHN J. RHODES, Arizona
DANIEL J. FLOOD, Pennsylvania
GLENN R. DAVIS, Wisconsin
JOHN M. SLACK, West Virginia
JOSEPH P. ADDABBO, New York
FRANK E. EVANS, Colorado

PART 5
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

------

PAGE 129
TUESDAY, JULY 1, 1969

SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS

There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.

Mr. Sikes. Are we doing any work in that field?
Dr. MacArthur. We are not.
Mr. Sikes. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
Dr. MacArthur. Certainly not lack of interest.
Mr. Sikes. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be, the time and the cost involved?
Dr. MacArthur. We will be very happy to.

(The information follows:)

The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:

1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.

2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.

3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.

...

It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of the ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.