RINO attack is a good reason to vote for Murray Sabrin -- Endorsed by Ron Paul
RINO attack is a good reason to vote for Murray Sabrin
Posted by Paul Mulshine May 15, 2008 3:55PM
There is one point on which virtually all conservatives in this state agree: The Whitman administration was a disaster.
The insane affordable-housing regulations that I denounced in my prior post are a direct result of Christie Whitman's pandering to liberal housing activists who despise suburban Republicans. Worse, her hand-picked state Supreme Court gave us the decisions that created much of the housing mess as well as the current school-funding situation, in which suburban schools count themselves lucky if they receive one-tenth the aid that the urban districts receive.
So when a high-ranking politician from that era denounces a candidate, you can take that as a recommendation that the candidate in question deserves your vote.
In this case, the candidate is Murray Sabrin, who is running for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate. In a recent post on the In The Lobby site, Sabrin is denounced by Don Sico, who was executive director of the Assembly in the Whitman years. Sico was thus was intimately involved in formulating the RINO (Republican In Name Only) policies that led to the collapse of the Republican Party in New Jersey.
In the post, Sico attacks Sabrin for, among other torts, "raping and pillaging our President, our Presidential Nominee, our State Chairman, our County Chairmen, our Republican Legislative Leaders, our beliefs, our ideals, our principles and whatever order and discourse we had left."
In other words, Sabrin is denouncing a list of boobs from bottom to top. I challenge anyone out there to go down that list and find a single politician who doesn't believe in immigration amnesty, for example. The same holds for the nutty "neoconservative" (i.e. liberal) foreign policy of George Bush and a whole lot of other disastrous RINO policies that brought the national party to the same level of ruin that Whitman et al. inflicted on the state GOP.
So that alone is reason to vote for Murray.
And then there's this list of "more whacky (misspelled, by the way) ideas proffered by the professor:"
"In an attempt to woo the young college voter, he has suggested that we allow states to lower the drinking age - as if enough of their friends and classmates were not already dying on our roads."
I don't know about the aforementioned RINOs. But when it comes to conservatives, among "our beliefs, our ideals, our principles" is the principle of federalism. No Republican worthy of the name would ever suggest it is the proper role of the federal government to tell the states what the drinking age should be.
That's the sort of thing you'd expect from .... I'm not saying. I'll leave this as a little quiz. What liberal Democratic senator sponsored the federal 18-year-old drinking age?
First correct answer wins a six-pack of beer. Just pick it up at your local liquor store. Tell them I said they shouldn't charge you for it.
----------
BLOG NOTE: RINOs like Don Sico, Christie Whitman and Tom Wilson are "raping and pillaging our Government, our Treasury, our Military, our Dollar, our Middle Class, our beliefs, our ideals, our principles..." -- which were built on our original Republican party principles of the Jeffersonian ideals of limited government and Constitutional republics.
Christie Whitman will be responsible for the death of 40,000 9/11 First Responders for her comments that "their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink".
In the case against Whitman, Federal Judge Deborah Batts said, "No reasonable person would have thought that telling thousands of people that it was safe to return to lower Manhattan, while knowing that such return could pose long-term health risks and other dire consequences, was conduct sanctioned by our laws." Judge Batts continued saying Whitman's actions were "conscience-shocking". However, Whitman was ultimately found not liable due to the fact that President Bush told her contradictory information.
Posted by Paul Mulshine May 15, 2008 3:55PM
There is one point on which virtually all conservatives in this state agree: The Whitman administration was a disaster.
The insane affordable-housing regulations that I denounced in my prior post are a direct result of Christie Whitman's pandering to liberal housing activists who despise suburban Republicans. Worse, her hand-picked state Supreme Court gave us the decisions that created much of the housing mess as well as the current school-funding situation, in which suburban schools count themselves lucky if they receive one-tenth the aid that the urban districts receive.
So when a high-ranking politician from that era denounces a candidate, you can take that as a recommendation that the candidate in question deserves your vote.
In this case, the candidate is Murray Sabrin, who is running for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate. In a recent post on the In The Lobby site, Sabrin is denounced by Don Sico, who was executive director of the Assembly in the Whitman years. Sico was thus was intimately involved in formulating the RINO (Republican In Name Only) policies that led to the collapse of the Republican Party in New Jersey.
In the post, Sico attacks Sabrin for, among other torts, "raping and pillaging our President, our Presidential Nominee, our State Chairman, our County Chairmen, our Republican Legislative Leaders, our beliefs, our ideals, our principles and whatever order and discourse we had left."
In other words, Sabrin is denouncing a list of boobs from bottom to top. I challenge anyone out there to go down that list and find a single politician who doesn't believe in immigration amnesty, for example. The same holds for the nutty "neoconservative" (i.e. liberal) foreign policy of George Bush and a whole lot of other disastrous RINO policies that brought the national party to the same level of ruin that Whitman et al. inflicted on the state GOP.
So that alone is reason to vote for Murray.
And then there's this list of "more whacky (misspelled, by the way) ideas proffered by the professor:"
"In an attempt to woo the young college voter, he has suggested that we allow states to lower the drinking age - as if enough of their friends and classmates were not already dying on our roads."
I don't know about the aforementioned RINOs. But when it comes to conservatives, among "our beliefs, our ideals, our principles" is the principle of federalism. No Republican worthy of the name would ever suggest it is the proper role of the federal government to tell the states what the drinking age should be.
That's the sort of thing you'd expect from .... I'm not saying. I'll leave this as a little quiz. What liberal Democratic senator sponsored the federal 18-year-old drinking age?
First correct answer wins a six-pack of beer. Just pick it up at your local liquor store. Tell them I said they shouldn't charge you for it.
----------
BLOG NOTE: RINOs like Don Sico, Christie Whitman and Tom Wilson are "raping and pillaging our Government, our Treasury, our Military, our Dollar, our Middle Class, our beliefs, our ideals, our principles..." -- which were built on our original Republican party principles of the Jeffersonian ideals of limited government and Constitutional republics.
Christie Whitman will be responsible for the death of 40,000 9/11 First Responders for her comments that "their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink".
In the case against Whitman, Federal Judge Deborah Batts said, "No reasonable person would have thought that telling thousands of people that it was safe to return to lower Manhattan, while knowing that such return could pose long-term health risks and other dire consequences, was conduct sanctioned by our laws." Judge Batts continued saying Whitman's actions were "conscience-shocking". However, Whitman was ultimately found not liable due to the fact that President Bush told her contradictory information.
posted by The Builder at
7:25 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home